(BloodyRubbish) Well, it looks like Russia may be planting nuclear missiles off the coast of the United States; that is, if information given by Viktor Baranetz, a Russian military expert, is accurate. He is also an ex-Colonel and was the former defense ministry spokesman — so what he says should be taken very seriously.
Baranetz has claimed that, “Russia is “quietly ‘seeding’ the U.S. shoreline with nuclear ‘mole’ missiles” that “dig themselves in and ‘sleep’ until they are given the command” to detonate.”
It may sound like a decades old movie starring Steven Seagal, but just weeks ago it was widely reported by the mainstream media that a Russian ship was spotted off the coast of Delaware. This raised many questions about Russia’s intentions with the new Trump administration.
I believe the mainstream media only reported on the event because they thought it would make Donald Trump look weak. Luckily, the reporting of the event — and in turn the acceptance that the event actually happened in the eyes of the mainstream — may help wake more American’s up to the possibility that Russia is actually seeding our coast with nukes.
As reported by Fox News,
“The Russian ship was in international waters, 70 miles off the coast of Delaware and heading north at 10 knots, according to one official. The U.S. territory line is 12 nautical miles.
“…a U.S. official confirmed to Fox News that Russia had deployed ground-launched cruise missiles to two locations inside the country in December. The New York Times first reported that the Obama administration had previously seen the missiles — then in a testing phase — as a violation of a 1987 treaty between the U.S. and Russia that banned ground-launched intermediate-range missiles.
“But Russia has pressed ahead with its program, apparently testing a Trump administration which has sought better ties with Moscow — but is also fresh off the loss of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who resigned Monday night in the wake of a scandal surrounding his communications with Russia.”
Are Democrats working with the Russians?
Lately, Democrats have been on attack spewing false accusations about the Trump administration’s close relationship with Russia. The strange thing is that Democrats seem to have a much closer relationship with Russia than most realize. I’m not even talking about the recent photos released of Nancy Pelosi eating with the Russian ambassador after claiming they never met, or even the old photo of Chuck Schumer with Vladimir Putin.
It was President Obama who in the past told the Russians that he would have more “flexibility” after his next election to give into Russian demands — with the world only knowing by the then-President being caught by a hot mic. It was Hillary Clinton who sold incredibly large amounts of Uranium to the Russians. Are the Democrats pointing fingers at the Trump administration to take attention off of themselves?
Even further connections between the Democrats and Russians are coming to light, and these revelations show that those connected to the highest levels of the Democratic Party have taken large sums of money from Russians — to influence U.S. policy.
As reported by Town Hall,
“First, a few Trump aides had conversations with the Russian ambassador, or Russian officials. Trump Attorney General Jeff Sessions was a U.S. Senator at the time. That’s part of his job.
But talk about hypocrisy. It turns out many Democrat U.S. Senators had the same meetings. So did House Minority leader Nancy Pelosi. They all met with the same Russian Ambassador.
Secondly, Democrats seem to think talking to Russians is a crime. They even throw around words like “treason.” But they see no issue with Democrats taking millions of dollars from Russians?
Because it turns out that Tony Podesta, brother of Hillary’s national presidential campaign manager John Podesta is a super lobbyist who took huge money from the Russians in order to end U.S. government sanctions against Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank.”
As Trump plans on putting “America first”, it appears that Russia is continuing to step up its military tests in what can only be preparation for some sort of war. Is it because there are no longer enough Democrats in power to influence U.S. policy behind closed doors?
Now, as I am writing this article, it’s being reported by the New York Times that, “A senior American general told Congress on Wednesday that Russia has deployed a prohibited cruise missile, the first public confirmation by the United States that the Kremlin had fielded the weapon in violation of a landmark arms control agreement.
The missile is believed to have been moved in December from a test site in southern Russia to an undisclosed operational base.
“We believe that the Russians have deployed a land-based cruise missile that violates the spirit and intent of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty,” Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the House Armed Services Committee. “The system itself presents a risk to most of our facilities in Europe,” he added. “And we believe that the Russians have deliberately deployed it in order to pose a threat to NATO and to facilities within the NATO area of responsibility.”
It’s only a matter of time before we get the truth about what is actually going on with Russia. What we may eventually hear could possibly be in the form of a threat, that if the U.S. interfere’s with Russia’s plan, they will activate the nuclear missiles off the U.S. coast that are already planted.
It’s ironic that General Patton is a hero of President Trumps. He after all is famous for warning about Russia becoming too powerful after World War 2. If we listened to Patton, there would have never been a Cold War. Will Trump be forced to give an order against Russia that his hero would have been proud of?